![]() With ample amenities and a variety of events and activities for families and individuals alike, it has all you need and more. Strong retirement matching + generous benefits packageĪ vibrant and friendly capital city, this Midwest community is a wonderful place to call home.100% employer-paid health and dental for provider and family.Sign-on bonus and relocation assistance.Multiple cancer service lines including medical, radiation, and gynecologic oncology, genetic counseling, and clinical research.Great team environment + new cancer facility currently under construction.Leading cancer center for over 25 years.Darren Paylon confirmed that all the explosives had been detonated, but. The center will support you with a generous benefits package and a comfortable five-day workweek. Spokesperson for Controlled Demolition Group Ltd. Revealing the scope and breadth of public disbelief in the official government narrative surrounding the events of 9/11, even presidential candidate Jill Stein has recently called for a new investigation.An ideal opportunity, this radiation physicist offer includes $200,000+ income potential and the ability to collaborate with a gifted team across multiple cancer service lines. These respected experts’ new forensic analysis only adds to the growing movement of people calling for a new and impartial investigation into the collapse of the World Trade Center. The authors of the study note that the buildings fell with such speed and symmetry that they there was no other feasible explanation for the sudden collapse at free-fall speeds – directly refuting studies that attempted to debunk the idea that the building fell without resistance. Additionally, Jones has co-authored a number of papers documenting evidence of unreacted nano-thermitic material in the WTC dust. NIST, when confronted publicly with evidence produced by Chandler, finally admitted in its November 2008 Final Report that WTC 7 fell for 2.25 seconds in free-fall, but they brushed off this newly acknowledged fact as being 'consistent with the results of the global collapse analysis,' despite Sunders earlier statement. Perhaps most damning of all, the experts claimed that after a thorough forensic analysis of video footage of the building’s collapse, it revealed signs of a controlled implosion. Official investigations have never been able to thoroughly and coherently explain how this might have happened and various teams tasked with examining the collapse have raised difficult questions about the veracity of the government’s story. ![]() There were no other known cases of total structural collapses in high-rise buildings caused by fires and so it is deeply unusual that it should have happened three times in the space of one day, noted NIST. In 2002, the National Institute of Standards and Technology remarked that the case was exceptionally bizarre. The comprehensive study in Europhysics News directly challenges the official narrative and lends to a growing body of evidencethat seriously questions the veracity of the government narrative. To accomplish all this while achieving a nearly free-fall collapse is simply not physically possible, says Mason. The new study is the work of Steven Jones, former full professor of physics at Brigham Young University, Robert Korol, a professor emeritus of civil engineering at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, Anthony Szamboti, a mechanical design engineer with over 25 years of structural design experience in the aerospace and communications industries and Ted Walter, the director of strategy and development for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a nonprofit organization that today represents more than 2,500 architects and engineers. In the official collapse story, the kinetic energy (of motion) of the falling debris would have been largely absorbed by the existing structure, bending and twisting steel components, and breaking up 220 acres of concrete floors. “Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities,” the four physicists conclude in the damning report. While many in the mainstream have attempted to label anyone questioning the official narrative as a “tin foil hat” conspiracy theorist, many highly respected experts have come forward to lampoon the idea that the buildings collapsed due to the intense heat and fires following two terrorist-directed plane crashes. At 210 feet tall, the Glines Canyon Dam on Washington's Elwha River was the largest dam demolition ever. The official government position holds that the collapse of all three towers was due to intense heat inside of the buildings.īut a new forensic investigation into the collapse of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11, published in Europhysics News– a highly respected European physics magazine – claims that “the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.” Over the past 15 years many highly respected academics and experts have come forward to challenge the official narrative on the collapse of the WTC towers forwarded by the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |